<i>Date with Malice</i>: Excerpt Date with Malice: Excerpt Julia Chapman The second book in the Samson and Delilah Mystery series. Discount: <i>The Nearest Exit</i> by Olen Steinhauer Discount: The Nearest Exit by Olen Steinhauer Crime HQ Get a digital copy for only $2.99! Review: <i>The Silent Companions</i> by Laura Purcell Review: The Silent Companions by Laura Purcell Gabino Iglesias Read Gabino Iglesias's review! Review: <i>Last Ferry Home</i> by Kent Harrington Review: Last Ferry Home by Kent Harrington Kristin Centorcelli Read Kristin Centorcelli's review!
From The Blog
March 27, 2018
Dark Streets, Green River: The Murder and Mayhem Conference in Chicago
Susanna Calkins
March 23, 2018
Driver in the UK Tries to Pass as Homer Simpson After Getting Pulled Over
Adam Wagner
March 19, 2018
Q&A with Christi Daugherty, Author of The Echo Killing
Christi Daugherty and Crime HQ
March 16, 2018
Like Stealing Candy from... "Gumball Bandit" Steals Large Gumball Machine from Sacramento Animal Shelter
Adam Wagner
March 13, 2018
Q&A with Sebastian Rotella, Author of Rip Crew
Sebastian Rotella and John Valeri
Showing posts by: Michael D. Cicchini click to see Michael D. Cicchini's profile
Thu
Apr 6 2017 12:00pm

Steven Avery and the Criminal Justice Machinery

Making a Murderer made a compelling case that Steven Avery was actually innocent of the Teresa Halbach murder. And Avery’s guilt or innocence is still a topic of debate—at least in some circles. For example, Ken Kratz and Peter Wilkinson wrote a book that promises to prove, once and for all, that Avery is guilty.

But this debate about factual guilt or innocence badly misses the point. In my new book Convicting Avery: The Bizarre Laws and Broken System behind Making a Murderer, I demonstrate how Avery’s conviction is unreliable due to the deeply flawed rules and procedures that were used to obtain it. 

For example, Wisconsin’s ethics rules allowed Kratz to try the case in the media long before the real trial began. Viewers of the documentary will remember Kratz describing Avery—in vivid detail—as the deranged, “full of sweat” uncle who raped Halbach before murdering her. As juror questionnaires later revealed, this pretrial media blitz erased the presumption of innocence and put Avery in a deep hole before his trial even started. 

[Read more about the trial laws that doomed Avery from the start...]