Log In Using
Facebook
Twitter
Google

Your CriminalElement.com Account
May 16, 2012 FM: Don't Ever Get Old by Daniel Friedman Terrie Farley Moran The most unlikely of heroes... May 15, 2012 Fresh Meat: The Dead of Summer by Mari Jungstedt Jordan Foster Nordic Island Crime May 15, 2012 Cryptos Conundrum: New Excerpt Chase Brandon No one had decoded it until now... May 12, 2012 FM: Richard Lloyd Parry's People Who Eat Darkness Richard Z. Santos What happens after the story's over?
From The Blog
May 16, 2012
You can't forget it—It's Chinatown!
John Geraci
May 16, 2012
No Place is Safe: The Perils of Interstellar Crime
Leslie Gilbert Elman
May 15, 2012
Ew. And Also, Ow: Public Naked Unicycling is Illegal.
Crime HQ
May 14, 2012
Westerns of the Sixties: Hombre
Jake Hinkson
May 14, 2012
Walt Disney's Taxi Driver?
Crime HQ
Showing posts by: Lyndsay Faye click to see Lyndsay Faye's profile
Sat
Mar 3 2012 10:00am
Excerpt
Lyndsay Faye

The Gods of Gotham by Lyndsay FayeAn excerpt from The Gods of Gotham by Lyndsay Faye (available March 15, 2012).

1845. New York City forms its first police force. The great potato famine hits Ireland. These two seemingly disparate events will change New York City. Forever.

Timothy Wilde tends bar near the Exchange, fantasizing about the day he has enough money to win the girl of his dreams. But when his dreams incinerate in a fire that devastates downtown Manhattan, he finds himself disfigured, unemployed, and homeless. His older brother obtains Timothy a job in the newly minted NYPD, but he is highly skeptical of this new “police force.” And he is less than thrilled that his new beat as a “copper star” is the the down-and-out Sixth Ward—at the border of Five Points, the world’s most notorious slum.

One night while making his rounds, Wilde literally runs into a little slip of a girl—a girl not more than ten years old—dashing through the dark in her nightshift . . . covered head to toe in blood.


Chapter 1

When I set down the initial report, sitting at my desk at the Tombs, I wrote:

On the night of August 21, 1845, one of the children escaped.

Of all the sordid trials a New York City policeman faces every day, you wouldn’t expect the one I loathe most to be paperwork. But it is. I get snakes down my spine just thinking about case files.

Police reports are meant to read “X killed Y by means of Z.” But facts without motives, without the story, are just road signs with all the letters worn off. Meaningless as blank tombstones. And I can’t bear reducing lives to the lowest of their statistics. Case notes give me the same parched-headed feeling I get after a night of badly made New England rum. There’s no room in the dry march of data to tell why people did bestial things—love or loathing, defense or greed. Or God, in this particular case, though I don’t suppose God was much pleased by it.

If He was watching. I was watching, and it didn’t please me any too keenly.

For instance, look what happens when I try to write an event from my childhood the way I’m required to write police reports:

In October 1826, in the hamlet of Greenwich Village, a fire broke out in a stable flush adjacent to the home of Timothy Wilde, his elder brother, Valentine Wilde, and his parents, Henry and Sarah; though the blaze started small, both of the adults were killed when the conflagration spread to the main house by means of a kerosene explosion.

I’m Timothy Wilde, and I’ll say right off, that tells you nothing. Nix. I’ve drawn pictures with charcoal all my life to busy my fingers, loosen the feeling of taut cord wrapped round my chest. A single sheet of butcher paper showing a gutted cottage with its blackened bones sticking out would tell you more than that sentence does.

But I’m getting better used to documenting crimes now that I wear the badge of a star police. And there are so many casualties in our local wars over God. I grant there must have been a time long ago when to call yourself a Catholic meant your bootprint was stamped on Protestant necks, but the passage of hundreds of years and a wide, wide ocean ought to have drowned that grudge between us, if anything could. Instead here I sit, penning a bloodbath. All those children, and not only the children, but grown Irish and Amer­icans and anyone ill-starred enough to be caught in the middle, and I only hope that writing it might go a way toward being a fit memo­rial. When I’ve spent enough ink, the sharp scratch of the specifics in my head will dull a little, I’m hoping. I’d assumed that the dry wooden smell of October, the shrewd way the wind twines into my coat sleeves now, would have begun erasing the nightmare of August by this time.

I was wrong. But I’ve been wrong about worse.

[Read the full excerpt of The Gods of Gotham by Lyndsay Faye]

Wed
Feb 29 2012 9:30am

Watson poster of Jude Law for Sherlock Holmes the movie

Yesterday in Part 1, we examined three Watsons (speaking of which, did you catch The Two Watsons comic?), but there are more modern Watsons yet to peruse.

As I said when we began: this one’s for the lovers of brave soldiers, able medics, and steadfast friends. And here’s to John Watson, who flew that flag before it was cool. This one’s for the other half of the partnership: the narrator, the everyman turned superhero, the teller of tales, the conductor of light. Sláinte.

[Watsons, Watsons, everywhere...]

Tue
Feb 28 2012 11:00am

Watson poster of Jude Law for Sherlock Holmes the movieHe emerges from a hellscape, bullet-pierced and feverish. Still game for trouble and drawn to the dangers that lurk in the dark. He survived a war-torn desert by the very skin of his teeth, and all the while he was engaged at healing. The perennial paradox of the Army doctor, giving life and taking it, all in the name of honor. When he arrived in London “worn with pain, and weak from the prolonged hardships” he had undergone, with “neither kith nor kin in England, and…therefore free as air,” he found himself bored. Shaken. In financial trouble and spiritual turmoil.

Then Dr. John H. Watson, MD, meets Mr. Sherlock Holmes. So it all works out for the best. Particularly for us: admirers of the fabled pair, and readers grateful for Watson’s efforts with a pen and a service revolver. 

Here’s to the lovers of brave soldiers, able medics, and steadfast friends. This one’s for you.  And here’s to John Watson, who flew that flag before it was cool. This one’s for the other half of the partnership: the narrator, the everyman turned superhero, the teller of tales, the conductor of light. Sláinte.

[And to the men who have portrayed him...let’s raise a glass!]

Tue
Jan 17 2012 9:30am

Sherlock fades as Moriarty rises

In December of 1893, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was guilty of the premeditated and willful murder of Mr. Sherlock Holmes of Baker Street, a consulting detective of some public renown. “I have had such an overdose of [Holmes] that I feel towards him as I do toward pâté de foie gras, of which I once ate too much, so that the name of it gives me a sickly feeling to this day,” he had said previously. He wasn’t just whistling Dixie. In a reader response famed for its brevity and the universality of the sentiment among Victorian fans, “You brute,” a woman penned to the author, whose greater work—he imagined—was unfairly shackled to Holmes.

(Perhaps unfairly, SPOILERS abound for those daring to read on.)

The suggestion that people wore mourning bands in the streets to honor the fallen character may be apocryphal. But if I had a mourning band, I’d likely be sporting it today. So maybe it isn’t. And the Strand Magazine did lose approximately 20,000 subscriptions.

“You brutes,” I now address Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss, creators of BBC’s hit series Sherlock. But “brutes” as in the High and Holy Poobahs of Most Excellent, Thoughtful, Affecting, and Generally Heart-Incinerating Creators of Dramatic Television Content, Department of Ferocious Winning. Just to be clear.

[—Crystal. Go on!]

Wed
Jan 11 2012 12:30pm

Martin Freeman as John Watson and Benedict Cumberbatch as Sherlock on a tor in episode 2 of season 2, The Hounds of BaskervilleIt might be the most widely recognizable phrase in the Sherlock Holmes canon, barring that business about “whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth” (which Holmes did say), and “Elementary, my dear Watson” (which he didn’t say).  The statement is so loaded with the pungent Victorian scent of melodrama and succinctly rendered spookiness that when reading it—somewhere between the ages of around twelve and twenty, as is often the case—one sees the usefulness in fainting couches.

“Mr. Holmes,” Dr. Mortimer asserts, “they were the footprints of a gigantic hound!”

If this final sentence of chapter two of The Hound of the Baskervilles frightens you upon reading it, fantastic.  If a faint shiver or a surge of curiosity instead takes place, well and good.  The fact remains that the statement has become legendary as much for what it doesn’t say as for what it does.  Dr. Mortimer has never seen the devil hound, which is the stuff of local legend and is said to have “tore the throat out of” Hugo Baskerville, and frightened Sir Charles Baskerville to death.

But he has seen footprints.  What made them, and how, and to what extent can he trust the evidence of his own eyes?

Be also warned: Your eyes will see SPOILERS about this episode if you continue!

[A gigantic hound, I believe you said?!]

Wed
Jan 4 2012 9:30am

Holmes and Watson[No, you did not miss the US premiere of the BBC’s Sherlock Season 2. Some of us watched the UK feed and were anxious to discuss it. Believe me, we’ll be doing so again on May 6, when it premieres on this side of the pond! But if you don’t mind a few spoilers, dive on in!]

In the year 1891, when publishing a short story in the Strand Magazine no one realized would change the world of fiction, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle made a brave storytelling decision. Yes, it was also ballsy to take his eccentric, but not very lucratively received, “independent consulting detective” from A Study in Scarlet and The Sign of Four and turn him into a serial hero—a man who solved crimes not in novella form, which is difficult, but in jewel boxes of perfectly constructed short stories. Which is impossible. Read a tale lifted from The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and try to write something as audacious and delightful and efficient.

Go on.

I dare you.

As I say, the mere notion of creating a supersleuth and then presenting him in a series of articles was an innovative enough notion—yes, Monsieur C. Auguste Dupin also appeared in magazine short stories, and Edgar Allan Poe created the detective genre. But Poe died poor, and Doyle had no intention of doing likewise. No, what I consider to be the unprecedented move for pure talent, wit, and stones in the Adventures is as follows:

Why don’t I create a protagonist, argued Doyle, who is irresistible and eccentric and very nearly omnipotent?

And then, while I’m still building his resume and talking him up in his first short form adventure, why not have him beaten by a girl?

[Why not, indeed?]

Sun
Dec 18 2011 10:00am

I like testosterone.  Always have. If you like your testosterone served piping hot, with more than a splash of Tabasco, a creamy dollop of ultraviolence, and a healthy slice of goggle-wearing, tin car-driving, machine gun-wielding steampunk pie for dessert, look no further than this film.

I’ve a rather rueful confession to make: I collect Sherlock Holmes pastiches (including the ripely terrible ones) and would probably think fondly of a wet paper bag on the side of the road so long as it had the words “Sherlock Holmes” written on it.  That being said, did I enjoy Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, the latest installment in the ever so brawny Ritchie franchise?

Yes. I enjoyed it like a house on fire. In many aspects I loved it, and in one single aspect, the storytelling improves on Arthur Conan Doyle. Heresy! you shout, but I’ll come back to that.

There are SPOILERS ahead, nothing too drastic, but a few salient points. Without giving the Game away, of course.

[Onward, we must!]

Mon
Dec 12 2011 9:30am

Pondering Guy Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes: Jude Law as John Watson and Robert Downey, Jr. as The Great Detective

On December 24th of 2009—long, long ago, eons past, before Benedict Timothy Carlton Cumberbatch elevated Belstaff winter wear to the crown prince’s robes of Sherlockian culture—Roger Ebert wrote a review of Guy Ritchie’s hotly anticipated film Sherlock Holmes, starring Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law.  “The less I thought about Sherlock Holmes,” he said, writing for the Chicago Sun-Times, “the more I liked Sherlock Holmes.” 

It’s a fair assessment.  The film is a grimy pageant of pseudo-Victorian steampunkery, in which murder, melodrama, mayhem, and yes, an ever-so-slight thread of mystery, too, are churned together into a gloriously gritty Sherlockian piña colada.  That the film isn’t thoughtful is largely irrelevant—it’s cracking good fun, and most critics agreed that the fact things hardly ever exploded in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s sixty-tale series is no reason why things should not explode now.  Sherlock Holmes, he of the masterful intellect and the cherrywood pipe, can exist in a world where things explode indiscriminately and not suffer much by it.  The question now seems to be, will Sherlockians remain pleased with Downey’s manic wit and the explosions surrounding him, when the BBC series Sherlock is also cracking good fun, and deeply thoughtful to boot?

[Hmmm.  Let’s have a puff and cogitate upon it, shall we?]

Thu
Dec 1 2011 11:00am

Blood Innocents by Thomas H. CookI’ve never downloaded an electronic book.

My book has sold a number of Kindle copies, which leads me to feel a strange imbalance—what does it mean that I produce material for a media I don’t engage in?

I am not one of the people who insist that all books must be printed matter, and can sympathize with the argument that denigrating e-books is classist. While the Harry Potter series was being released while I was in college, for example, I would go quite unashamedly to Barnes and Noble down the road from my dorm and read them cover to cover.  (I was careful to leave them in pristine condition.)  An e-reader might have saved me from awkward moments sitting on industrial carpeting, but given a choice, I’d much prefer to read a book with pages and ink and binding.

Otto Penzler—editor of over fifty mystery anthologies, owner of the Mysterious Bookshop, longtime Mystery Writers of America board of directors member, and a man whose name has been synonymous with mystery fiction for decades, not to mention a nifty fellow—has just launched a digital version of his publishing house, MysteriousPress.comMy Luddite tendencies are many and varied, so I asked why a leader in the field of print publishing for so many years would delve into the digital market.

Otto Penzler:  I don’t own a Kindle or Nook or iPhone or anything technical beyond my 25-year-old television. There’s a cell phone around here someplace, but I have no idea where. I read real books. Yes, I think e-books will ruin (no, let me rephrase that—have already ruined) many bookstores, and more will die because of them. Still, I can’t help but recognize that they are terrific in terms of affordability and accessibility.

[Hidebound, yet forward-looking. . .]

Mon
May 23 2011 1:34pm

Edward Hardwicke as Dr. Watson from Granada Television’s Sherlock Holmes productionsEdward Hardwicke, known to fans round the globe as the second actor to play Dr. John Watson in Granada Television’s beloved Sherlock Holmes series, passed away due to cancer at the age of 78 on the 16th of May, 2011.  A former pilot officer in the Royal Air Force, he is survived by daughters Kate and Emma, stepdaughter Claire, and his second wife, Prim Cotton.

Known by his friends and co-workers as a man of great warmth and generosity of spirit, Hardwicke’s connections to the Sherlockian world were almost uncannily extensive.  Hardwicke’s father, contract RKO actor Cedric Hardwicke, was close friends with Nigel Bruce, of the iconic Rathbone and Bruce productions of Sherlock Holmes for the big screen, when the family lived and worked in Hollywood.

[A fine actor and uncommon Everyman. . .]

Mon
May 9 2011 9:00am

or A Good Nemesis is Hard to Find

Professor Moriarty and Sherlock Holmes Sir Arthur Conan Doyle famously thought about as much of writing new tales for his Great Detective as Scarlett O’Hara thought of farming her own vegetables.  While necessary for continued survival, the task didn’t exactly thrill the gentleman, and by December of 1893, he had succumbed to his darkest urges and shoved Sherlock Holmes from the top of a very tall, very wet waterfall in Switzerland.  The key problem with “The Final Problem,” Holmes’s temporary swan song, was Doyle’s urgency; he thirsted so for the detective’s blood that he produced a frankly ridiculous short story in which an elderly maths professor with odd spinal curvature manages to wrestle a 37-year-old boxer, singlestick expert, and “baritsu” fighter—who can untwist bent steel fireplace pokers, by the way—to his death.  Enter Messrs. Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss of BBC’s television series Sherlock, who in episode three of the first season go one better than Doyle himself by giving us an arch-rivalry that actually makes a lick of sense.

[Maybe Sherlock forgot to limber up?]

Sun
May 1 2011 2:00pm

Fu Manchu photoor the End of a Perfectly Good Moustache

The adventures of Sherlock Holmes, as they were genuine adventures, were always embellished with flourishes of the exotic.  Doyle knew his audience, and Britishers who had never so much as set foot outside their own nation thrilled to accounts speckled with not merely Indian swamp adders (which do not exist) but pint-sized, blowdart-wielding, cannibalistic, “naturally hideous” Andaman Islanders (who do not exist either) and “rascally Lascars” (who may possibly exist, but surely would fail to appreciate the description).  As stories, they are products of an empire-building nation preoccupied with tales of faraway lands.  I wonder, though, when presented with the second episode of BBC's rightly lauded series Sherlock, entitled “The Blind Banker,” whether we need quite such a dose of the same aesthetic these days, within the context of modern adaptations.  I strongly suspect we don't.

[Orientalism: the good, the bad, and the ugly.]

Mon
Apr 25 2011 4:00am

Say No to Deerstalker Sherlock Hunting CapI'm one of the very few Sherlockians I know possessed of a rabid aversion to deerstalkers.  When I think about the iconic chapeau of our personal hero, I get an expression on my face not dissimilar to Keith Olbermann's moments before the glasses are torn off and Camera Three gets a wet lensful of disdain. 

There are only two good reasons for this quirk, really.  First, the deerstalker was a spring-in-the-countryside sort of accessory, the kind that required a rifle and muddy tweeds and a spaniel called Byron or Lulu, and they are tragically overused by peddlers of Sherlock Holmes-related culture and paraphernalia, and the proper use of fashionable accessories is a practice very dear to my heart.  And second, I was born right around when AC/DC was busy releasing Back in Black, which means that “my” Sherlock Holmes was never going to be Christopher Plummer in Murder By Decree, leaving the opera wearing a. . .a thing on his head resembling a sordid affair between a pancake and a tartan skirt.  I've never sat through an entire Basil Rathbone film, because the instant poor Nigel Bruce opens his mouth, I start seething.  Jeremy Brett, he of the Sidney Paget-appropriate sartorial choices, undeniable theatrical talent, and slightly overcaffeinated facial expressions, came within a close shave.

And now there is Benedict Cumberbatch swanning ferociously about in a Belstaff coat and wine-colored dress shirts, and the Holmes in my head is alive and well and living in London.

[Who needs a deerstalker when you've got looks like these. . .?]